• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Suez Canal University Medical Journal
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 28 (2025)
Volume Volume 27 (2024)
Volume Volume 26 (2023)
Volume Volume 25 (2022)
Volume Volume 24 (2021)
Volume Volume 23 (2020)
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 22 (2019)
Volume Volume 21 (2018)
Volume Volume 20 (2017)
Volume Volume 19 (2016)
Volume Volume 18 (2015)
Volume Volume 17 (2014)
Volume Volume 16 (2013)
Volume Volume 15 (2012)
Volume Volume 14 (2011)
Volume Volume 13 (2010)
El Yamany, M., Mehanna, A., Mohamed, H. (2020). Success Rate of Endovascular Intervention in the Treatment of Central Venous Stenosis or Occlusion in Hemodialysis Patients. Suez Canal University Medical Journal, 23(2), 143-155. doi: 10.21608/scumj.2020.126148
Mohamed M. El Yamany; Ahmed T. Mehanna; Hatem H. Mohamed. "Success Rate of Endovascular Intervention in the Treatment of Central Venous Stenosis or Occlusion in Hemodialysis Patients". Suez Canal University Medical Journal, 23, 2, 2020, 143-155. doi: 10.21608/scumj.2020.126148
El Yamany, M., Mehanna, A., Mohamed, H. (2020). 'Success Rate of Endovascular Intervention in the Treatment of Central Venous Stenosis or Occlusion in Hemodialysis Patients', Suez Canal University Medical Journal, 23(2), pp. 143-155. doi: 10.21608/scumj.2020.126148
El Yamany, M., Mehanna, A., Mohamed, H. Success Rate of Endovascular Intervention in the Treatment of Central Venous Stenosis or Occlusion in Hemodialysis Patients. Suez Canal University Medical Journal, 2020; 23(2): 143-155. doi: 10.21608/scumj.2020.126148

Success Rate of Endovascular Intervention in the Treatment of Central Venous Stenosis or Occlusion in Hemodialysis Patients

Article 5, Volume 23, Issue 2, October 2020, Page 143-155  XML PDF (630.88 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/scumj.2020.126148
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Mohamed M. El Yamany email ; Ahmed T. Mehanna; Hatem H. Mohamed
Department of Surgery, Vascular and Endovascular Unit, Suez Canal University Hospital, Ismailia, Egypt
Abstract
Background: Central venous stenosis or occlusion (CVSO) is a major complication in hemodialysis patients that significantly affects morbidity and failure of the peripheral arteriovenous fistula (AVF). However, the best treatment is still unknown (surgical or endovascular). Endovascular treatment is a widely accepted option that includes percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with or without stenting. The optimal endovascular treatment is still undetermined. Aim: To study the success rate and effect of endovascular intervention as angioplasty alone or with stenting, in patients with CVSO as optimal endovascular treatment still undetermined. Patients and Methods: this is uncontrolled clinical trial was conducted in Suez Canal University Hospital in the period between July 2017 to July 2019 and follow-up for 12 months. Thirty-four patients with compromised upper limb arteriovenous fistula due to CVSO were included to assess the patency rate of primary angioplasty with or without stenting. Any patients with (mediastinal lesion invading central veins, ipsilateral peripheral vein stenosis, or infected AVF) were excluded. Results: The mean age of studied patients was 53.06±8.49 with a slightly larger number (19) of females (56%). Pre-intervention, the innominate vein was the highest affected with lesion by 41%. Occlusion was in 9 patients (26%), while; 25patients (74%) had stenotic lesion. The success rate of primary patency was 55%, follow-up of the successful cases at 3, 6, and 12 months with patency rate 91%,77%, and 59% respectively. There was no significant difference in the patency rate during one-year follow-up regarding the use of angioplasty alone or with stenting. Conclusion: percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with or without stenting according to our results is successful, safe, and effective in managing central venous lesions in compromised AVF in hemodialysis patients.
 
Keywords
Angioplasty; Central veins; hemodialysis
Main Subjects
Clinical Research (Surgical)
Statistics
Article View: 237
PDF Download: 589
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.