• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Suez Canal University Medical Journal
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 28 (2025)
Volume Volume 27 (2024)
Volume Volume 26 (2023)
Volume Volume 25 (2022)
Volume Volume 24 (2021)
Volume Volume 23 (2020)
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 22 (2019)
Volume Volume 21 (2018)
Volume Volume 20 (2017)
Volume Volume 19 (2016)
Volume Volume 18 (2015)
Volume Volume 17 (2014)
Volume Volume 16 (2013)
Volume Volume 15 (2012)
Volume Volume 14 (2011)
Volume Volume 13 (2010)
Shalaby, E., Abd Elkader, O., Ghobish, A., Sakr, A. (2020). Bipolar Plasmakinetic Vaporization versus the Standard Monopolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Management of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia: Long Term Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Study. Suez Canal University Medical Journal, 23(1), 71-80. doi: 10.21608/scumj.2020.120781
Essam Shalaby; Osman Abd Elkader; Ammar Ghobish; Ahmed Sakr. "Bipolar Plasmakinetic Vaporization versus the Standard Monopolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Management of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia: Long Term Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Study". Suez Canal University Medical Journal, 23, 1, 2020, 71-80. doi: 10.21608/scumj.2020.120781
Shalaby, E., Abd Elkader, O., Ghobish, A., Sakr, A. (2020). 'Bipolar Plasmakinetic Vaporization versus the Standard Monopolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Management of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia: Long Term Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Study', Suez Canal University Medical Journal, 23(1), pp. 71-80. doi: 10.21608/scumj.2020.120781
Shalaby, E., Abd Elkader, O., Ghobish, A., Sakr, A. Bipolar Plasmakinetic Vaporization versus the Standard Monopolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Management of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia: Long Term Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Study. Suez Canal University Medical Journal, 2020; 23(1): 71-80. doi: 10.21608/scumj.2020.120781

Bipolar Plasmakinetic Vaporization versus the Standard Monopolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Management of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia: Long Term Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Study

Article 8, Volume 23, Issue 1, March 2020, Page 71-80  XML PDF (372.37 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/scumj.2020.120781
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Essam Shalaby email orcid 1; Osman Abd Elkader2; Ammar Ghobish2; Ahmed Sakr3
1Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
2Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
3Department of Urology, Zagazig University Hospital, Zagazig, Egypt
Abstract
Background: Monopolar Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has dominated the surgical treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to BPH with relatively high TUR associated morbidity. Due to advanced technology, spurred the development of new surgical alternatives as plasmakinetic vaporization of the prostate to overcome the TURP related morbidity. Aim: To compare the outcomes of bipolar plasmakinetic vaporization of the prostate (PKVP) in saline with the standard monopolar TURP in-patients with bothersome LUTS. Patients and Methods: Two hundred and six patients with bothering LUTS were randomly divided into two groups, PKVP (GI) or TURP (GII). Patients demographics and preoperative data were compared, including prostate volume, international prostate symptoms score (IPSS), quality of life (QOL), maximum flow rate (Qmax), post voiding residual volume (PVR), prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Postoperative adverse events and long-term reoperation rates were also compared. Results: Preoperatively, both groups were comparable in demographic data, prostate volume, IPSS, Qmax, and PVR. Both groups showed comparative functional improvement in IPSS, QOL, Qmax, and PVR. Compared to GII patients, GI patients had a significantly lower operative time (62.3±17 vs. 68.6±20 min, p < /em>=0.03), catheterization time (3.4±1.3 vs. 4.5±1.4 d), and hospital stay (2.7±1.1 vs 3.3±1.3 d). Reduction in hemoglobin and serum sodium was significantly higher in GII patients. Clot retention occurs in 3.4% in G1 vs. 7.7% in G2 while blood transfusion needed for 8.9% of patients in GII. After a 36-month follow-up, 10.5% and 7.7% of patients needed reoperation in GI and GII, respectively (p>0.05). Conclusion: Long-term results revealed comparable safety and efficacy of PKVP and monopolar TURP in the management of bothersome LUTS secondary to BPH. However, PKVP seems to have lower perioperative morbidity (i.e. reduced blood loss, shorter catheterization time, shorter hospital stay, comparable reoperation rate, and better alternative to monopolar TURP.
 
Keywords
Prostate; Plasmakinetic; vaporization; transurethral; resection
Statistics
Article View: 257
PDF Download: 500
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.