• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Suez Canal University Medical Journal
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 28 (2025)
Volume Volume 27 (2024)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 26 (2023)
Volume Volume 25 (2022)
Volume Volume 24 (2021)
Volume Volume 23 (2020)
Volume Volume 22 (2019)
Volume Volume 21 (2018)
Volume Volume 20 (2017)
Volume Volume 19 (2016)
Volume Volume 18 (2015)
Volume Volume 17 (2014)
Volume Volume 16 (2013)
Volume Volume 15 (2012)
Volume Volume 14 (2011)
Volume Volume 13 (2010)
Mahmoud Mohamed, E., Abou-Setta, A., Ibrahim, I. (2024). The Efficiency of Automated Auditory Brain Stem Response Test Inclusion in Neonatal Hearing Screening Programs: A Systematic Review. Suez Canal University Medical Journal, 27(7), 0-0. doi: 10.21608/scumj.2024.432644
Eman Ibrahim Mahmoud Mohamed; Alaa Eldin Abou-Setta; Ibrahim Ibrahim. "The Efficiency of Automated Auditory Brain Stem Response Test Inclusion in Neonatal Hearing Screening Programs: A Systematic Review". Suez Canal University Medical Journal, 27, 7, 2024, 0-0. doi: 10.21608/scumj.2024.432644
Mahmoud Mohamed, E., Abou-Setta, A., Ibrahim, I. (2024). 'The Efficiency of Automated Auditory Brain Stem Response Test Inclusion in Neonatal Hearing Screening Programs: A Systematic Review', Suez Canal University Medical Journal, 27(7), pp. 0-0. doi: 10.21608/scumj.2024.432644
Mahmoud Mohamed, E., Abou-Setta, A., Ibrahim, I. The Efficiency of Automated Auditory Brain Stem Response Test Inclusion in Neonatal Hearing Screening Programs: A Systematic Review. Suez Canal University Medical Journal, 2024; 27(7): 0-0. doi: 10.21608/scumj.2024.432644

The Efficiency of Automated Auditory Brain Stem Response Test Inclusion in Neonatal Hearing Screening Programs: A Systematic Review

Article 6, Volume 27, Issue 7, July 2024, Page 0-0  XML
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/scumj.2024.432644
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Eman Ibrahim Mahmoud Mohamed email ; Alaa Eldin Abou-Setta; Ibrahim Ibrahim
Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Suez of Canal University, Ismilia, Egypt.
Abstract
Background: One of the developmental abnormalities that may not be readily apparent at birth is congenital hearing loss. Neonates’ universal hearing screening program have been implemented because early hearing loss recognition is advantageous to a child's development. This study aimed to find out the evidence of the efficiency of AABR in neonatal programs of hearing screening in early detection and diagnosis of neonatal hearing loss. Methods: This systematic review study adhered to the PRISMA guidelines during the preparation and other steps according to systematic reviews of intervention Cochrane handbook. After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria to study abstracts yielded 16 articles. Results: We identified 16 studies discussing efficiency of automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) test in neonatal hearing loss screening with a total number of 462917 neonates. The age range across the studies ranged from neonates of hours after birth to infants of 4 months. The pooled estimate of sensitivity of automated auditory brain stem response test was 88.9% (95% CI: [0.767, 0.952]). The pooled estimate of specificity of automated auditory brain stem response test was 94.2% (95% CI: [0.721, 0.990]). The pooled estimate of positive likelihood ratio of automated auditory brain stem response test was 17.050 (95% CI: [3.9, 74.155]). The pooled estimate of negative likelihood ratio of automated auditory brain stem response test was 0.115 (95% CI: [0.069, 0.194]). The AABR was a good hearing screening test with high coverage rate and low referral rate, with sensitivity of 88.9%, specificity of 94.2% and area under the curve of more than 99%. Conclusion: This study concluded that AABR is an efficient screening procedure for hearing loss among neonates with very good sensitivity and excellent specificity. AABR has a high coverage rate and low referral rate.
Keywords
Congenital hearing loss; neonatal hearing loss; AABR; screening
Main Subjects
Clinical Research (Surgical)
Statistics
Article View: 36
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.