• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Suez Canal University Medical Journal
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 28 (2025)
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 27 (2024)
Volume Volume 26 (2023)
Volume Volume 25 (2022)
Volume Volume 24 (2021)
Volume Volume 23 (2020)
Volume Volume 22 (2019)
Volume Volume 21 (2018)
Volume Volume 20 (2017)
Volume Volume 19 (2016)
Volume Volume 18 (2015)
Volume Volume 17 (2014)
Volume Volume 16 (2013)
Volume Volume 15 (2012)
Volume Volume 14 (2011)
Volume Volume 13 (2010)
Alhubaishi, L., Jamal, N., Alani, O., Alismaily, H. (2025). Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Professional-Review. Suez Canal University Medical Journal, 28(4), 1-9. doi: 10.21608/scumj.2025.431920
Laila Y.A. Alhubaishi; Noor S. Jamal; Osama S. Alani; Habib M. Alismaily. "Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Professional-Review". Suez Canal University Medical Journal, 28, 4, 2025, 1-9. doi: 10.21608/scumj.2025.431920
Alhubaishi, L., Jamal, N., Alani, O., Alismaily, H. (2025). 'Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Professional-Review', Suez Canal University Medical Journal, 28(4), pp. 1-9. doi: 10.21608/scumj.2025.431920
Alhubaishi, L., Jamal, N., Alani, O., Alismaily, H. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Professional-Review. Suez Canal University Medical Journal, 2025; 28(4): 1-9. doi: 10.21608/scumj.2025.431920

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Professional-Review

Article 1, Volume 28, Issue 4, April 2025, Page 1-9  XML PDF (733.75 K)
Document Type: Review Article
DOI: 10.21608/scumj.2025.431920
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Laila Y.A. Alhubaishi1; Noor S. Jamal email 2; Osama S. Alani3; Habib M. Alismaily4
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Latifa Women and Children Hospital, Dubai Health, UAE. Program Director of Obstetrics and Gynecology training program
2General Practitioner, Teaching Assistant at Faculty of Medicine, University of Sharjah
3Anesthesia Consultant, Trauma and Emergency Center (Dubai Health Authority), Rashid Hospital, Dubai, UAE
4Consultant Orthopedic Surgeon, Rashid Hospital, Dubai, UAE
Abstract
Background: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols increase the efficacy of physiological recovery from surgery via evidence-based perioperative care. Though widely adopted in various specialties, their application in obstetrics and gynecology needs targeted evaluation due to unique physiological and clinical factors. Aim: This review aimed to assess current evidence on ERAS protocols in obstetrics and gynecology, focusing on implementation strategies, clinical outcomes, and healthcare impact, while identifying specialty-specific considerations and areas for future growth. Methods: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar for peer-reviewed articles published from January 2019 to December 2023. Selected studies were evaluated through a systematic approach for implementation, outcomes, impacts on healthcare, and were inclusive of diverse research designs. A narrative synthesis approach was employed. Results: 24 studies met the inclusion criteria, including randomized trials, cohort studies, and reviews. ERAS protocols showed consistent benefits: reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, decreased opioid use, and improved patient satisfaction. With regards to obstetrics, cesarean-centric protocols boosted pain management and patient mobilization, while gynecology, particularly oncology, saw fewer complications and faster recovery with ERAS implementation. Collaborative teamwork was essential, especially with the positive impact on the economics of reduced healthcare utilization. Conclusions: ERAS protocols provide significant benefits in obstetrics and gynecology. Adaptation by specialists specific to the discipline is essential, as is staff education and team cohesion. Standardization of protocols, incorporation of digital elements, and focus on outpatient services are optimal areas for future enhancement of ERAS protocols.
Keywords
ERAS; Obestetrics and Gynecology surgery
Main Subjects
Clinical Research (Medical)
Statistics
Article View: 76
PDF Download: 61
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.