• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Suez Canal University Medical Journal
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 28 (2025)
Volume Volume 27 (2024)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 11
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 26 (2023)
Volume Volume 25 (2022)
Volume Volume 24 (2021)
Volume Volume 23 (2020)
Volume Volume 22 (2019)
Volume Volume 21 (2018)
Volume Volume 20 (2017)
Volume Volume 19 (2016)
Volume Volume 18 (2015)
Volume Volume 17 (2014)
Volume Volume 16 (2013)
Volume Volume 15 (2012)
Volume Volume 14 (2011)
Volume Volume 13 (2010)
Aboelenen, M., Hussain, H., Kamel, M., Elyamany, M. (2024). Aneurysmorrhaphy vs Bypass Graft during Arteriovenous Fistula Aneurysm Management in End Stage Renal Disease Patients. Suez Canal University Medical Journal, 27(8), 12-20. doi: 10.21608/scumj.2024.425416
Mohamed Elsayed Aboelenen; Hatem Hussain; Mohammed M. Kamel; Mohamed Elyamany. "Aneurysmorrhaphy vs Bypass Graft during Arteriovenous Fistula Aneurysm Management in End Stage Renal Disease Patients". Suez Canal University Medical Journal, 27, 8, 2024, 12-20. doi: 10.21608/scumj.2024.425416
Aboelenen, M., Hussain, H., Kamel, M., Elyamany, M. (2024). 'Aneurysmorrhaphy vs Bypass Graft during Arteriovenous Fistula Aneurysm Management in End Stage Renal Disease Patients', Suez Canal University Medical Journal, 27(8), pp. 12-20. doi: 10.21608/scumj.2024.425416
Aboelenen, M., Hussain, H., Kamel, M., Elyamany, M. Aneurysmorrhaphy vs Bypass Graft during Arteriovenous Fistula Aneurysm Management in End Stage Renal Disease Patients. Suez Canal University Medical Journal, 2024; 27(8): 12-20. doi: 10.21608/scumj.2024.425416

Aneurysmorrhaphy vs Bypass Graft during Arteriovenous Fistula Aneurysm Management in End Stage Renal Disease Patients

Article 2, Volume 27, Issue 8, August 2024, Page 12-20  XML PDF (871.15 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/scumj.2024.425416
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Mohamed Elsayed Aboelenen email ; Hatem Hussain; Mohammed M. Kamel; Mohamed Elyamany
Department of Surgery, Vascular Surgery Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
Abstract
Background: Aneurysmal dilatation is considered one of the most common complications that may threaten the function of AVF and even the life of the patient if ruptured. To date, there is no gold standard approach for the management of AVF aneurysms. Objectives: To compare the outcome of aneurysmorrhaphy bypass graft regarding the patency and complication rates. Methods: This uncontrolled comparative clinical trial was conducted at Suez Canal University Hospital. Sixty-four patients were equally and randomly allocated into either Aneurysmorrhaphy or bypass graft group. Hemodialysis adult patients with aneurysmal functioning AVF were included in this study. Patients with upper limb ischemia, thrombosed AVF aneurysm, or hypotension were excluded. Results: The mean age of the studied patients was 39.8± 8.6 years. There was no significant variation either in the flow rate or in preoperative maximum diameter between the two groups. Postoperative maximum diameter was significantly higher among aneurysmorrhaphy (12.9± 3.4 mm) compared to bypass graft (6 mm) one day, one-month, and six-month postoperative with a significant decrease in the diameter of both groups compared to the preoperative diameter. Post-operative edema, hematoma, and thrombosis were higher in group A, while after six months infection and thrombosis were higher in group B. Conclusion: Aneurysmorrhaphy showed higher patency outcomes, post-operative maximum diameter, and thrombosis. While the bypass graft showed a higher incidence of infection
Keywords
Aneurysmorrhaphy; hemodialysis; bypass graft
Main Subjects
Clinical Research (Surgical)
Statistics
Article View: 33
PDF Download: 53
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.