• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Suez Canal University Medical Journal
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 28 (2025)
Volume Volume 27 (2024)
Volume Volume 26 (2023)
Issue Issue 12
Issue Issue 10
Issue Issue 9
Issue Issue 8
Issue Issue 7
Issue Issue 6
Issue Issue 5
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 25 (2022)
Volume Volume 24 (2021)
Volume Volume 23 (2020)
Volume Volume 22 (2019)
Volume Volume 21 (2018)
Volume Volume 20 (2017)
Volume Volume 19 (2016)
Volume Volume 18 (2015)
Volume Volume 17 (2014)
Volume Volume 16 (2013)
Volume Volume 15 (2012)
Volume Volume 14 (2011)
Volume Volume 13 (2010)
Salama, K., Ali, M., Omar, R., Mohammed, Y. (2023). Predictive Factors and Bio-Clinical Scoring Systems of Massive Blood Transfusion in Trauma Patients Attending Emergency Department. Suez Canal University Medical Journal, 26(9), 0-0. doi: 10.21608/scumj.2023.324134
Khaled M. Salama; Mohamed A. Ali; Reda M. Omar; Yahya B. Mohammed. "Predictive Factors and Bio-Clinical Scoring Systems of Massive Blood Transfusion in Trauma Patients Attending Emergency Department". Suez Canal University Medical Journal, 26, 9, 2023, 0-0. doi: 10.21608/scumj.2023.324134
Salama, K., Ali, M., Omar, R., Mohammed, Y. (2023). 'Predictive Factors and Bio-Clinical Scoring Systems of Massive Blood Transfusion in Trauma Patients Attending Emergency Department', Suez Canal University Medical Journal, 26(9), pp. 0-0. doi: 10.21608/scumj.2023.324134
Salama, K., Ali, M., Omar, R., Mohammed, Y. Predictive Factors and Bio-Clinical Scoring Systems of Massive Blood Transfusion in Trauma Patients Attending Emergency Department. Suez Canal University Medical Journal, 2023; 26(9): 0-0. doi: 10.21608/scumj.2023.324134

Predictive Factors and Bio-Clinical Scoring Systems of Massive Blood Transfusion in Trauma Patients Attending Emergency Department

Article 9, Volume 26, Issue 9, September 2023, Page 0-0  XML
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/scumj.2023.324134
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Khaled M. Salama; Mohamed A. Ali; Reda M. Omar; Yahya B. Mohammed email orcid
Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Abstract
 
Background: Early identification of patients with critical bleeding and coagulopathy who may need massive blood transfusion remains a major challenge, owing to its significant association with high morbidity and mortality in severely injured patients. Aim: We aimed to compare the accuracy of five prediction models of massive transfusion scores; Trauma trauma-associated severe Hemorrhage (TASH) score, Assessment of Blood Consumption (ABC) score, Risk assessment and prediction tool (RAPT) score, and Emergency Transfusion Score (ETS) for the early prediction of the requirement for massive transfusion. Patients and Methods: A prospective observational and Comparative study was carried out at the Emergency Department of Suez Canal University Hospital in Ismailia and Maadi Military Complex in Cairo, on sixty trauma patients fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Correlation of all scoring systems with the requirement of massive transfusion, and severity of injuries. The area under the curve (AUROC) was used to compare the scoring systems, Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for each prediction model. Results: 83.13% of the patients received massive transfusion. The accuracy was higher for the TASH score (70%) than the ETS score (53.3%). Also, the Area under the curve (AUC) was greater in the TASH score (0.82) than in the ETS score (0.64). Conclusion: The TASH score is an easy and accurate scoring system that could predict the trauma patient’s requirement for massive transfusion and thus life-threatening hemorrhage could be predicted at a very early stage.
 

 
 
Keywords
Trauma-induced coagulopathy; Massive blood transfusion scores; TASH; ETS
Main Subjects
Clinical Research (Medical)
Statistics
Article View: 235
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.